Begin your assessment

Know where you stand with AI. Know what to do next.

If your school, university, or organization provided you with a code, enter it on this page to begin the assessment directly. Otherwise, register your interest in any track below.

Built for your context.

Fifteen tracks spanning teachers, students, and families, professional practice, government, healthcare, legal, financial services, insurance, executive leadership, journalism, and creative industries, each grounded in the competency frameworks of its audience. Your organization's code directs you to the right track automatically.

K-12 Teachers

For school teachers in primary and secondary education.
Higher Education

For faculty and instructors in universities and colleges.
K-12 Students, Grades 3-5

For students aged about 8 to 11. Concrete AI situations, read-aloud administration, and a strong trusted-adult boundary.
K-12 Students, Grades 6-8

For students aged about 11 to 14. School and social AI use, misinformation, academic integrity, privacy, and help-seeking.
K-12 Students, Grades 9-12

For students aged about 14 to 18. Research and evidence, data use, accountability, fairness, and consequential AI decisions.
Parents & Caregivers

For parents, guardians, and caregivers of school-age children. AI understanding, critical evaluation, safeguarding, and family AI governance.
Professional / Knowledge Worker

For professionals across all sectors who use AI in their work and want to build responsible, effective AI practice.
Government & Military

For civil servants, government officers, policymakers, and military personnel.
Healthcare & Clinical

For physicians, nurses, and clinical staff navigating AI in patient care, diagnostics, and healthcare operations.
Legal

For lawyers, paralegals, and legal professionals integrating AI within the bounds of professional ethics and confidentiality.
Financial Services

For banking, investment, and capital-markets professionals operating under supervisory expectations for AI explainability and model risk.
Insurance

For actuaries, underwriters, claims professionals, and insurance compliance officers operating under regulatory expectations for AI use by insurers.
Executive & Board

For C-suite leaders and board members responsible for AI governance, strategic investment, and organizational risk oversight.
Creative & Media

For designers, photographers, filmmakers, and commercial content producers working with generative AI across intellectual property, disclosure, and creative practice.
Journalism & News Media

For journalists, editors, and producers verifying AI-mediated content, detecting synthetic media, and maintaining provenance and accountability in published work.

Common questions.

How long does it take?

Most people complete the assessment in 20 to 25 minutes. There is no time limit.

Is it pass or fail?

No. The assessment returns a proficiency level and domain scores. There is no passing score. The purpose is to establish a baseline and identify areas for development.

Who sees my results?

Your results are visible to you immediately after submission. Whether they are shared with your organization depends on your organization's settings. You will be informed of this before you begin.

Can I retake it?

Retaking is subject to your organization's policy. Contact your administrator if you need to retake.

What if I don't have an access code?

The assessment is currently available through participating organizations. If your organization is not yet registered, use the Register Interest option on this page.

What professional context does it cover?

The assessment is available for fifteen tracks spanning teachers, students, and families, professional practice, government, healthcare, legal, financial services, insurance, executive leadership, journalism, and creative industries, each grounded in the competency frameworks of its audience. Your organization's code directs you to the right track automatically.

Also on this site

AI Critical Thinking Assessment: a validated self-report scale on how you work with generative AI, then a scored workplace simulation against an AI advisor seeded with flawed reasoning.